Card image cap

Saltzman Seminars: U.S. Supreme Court 2019 - 2020 Term Cases Involving Criminal Law Issues

Level: Intermediate
Runtime: 135 minutes
Recorded Date: December 23, 2020
Click here to share this program
Download PDF
Closed Caption


Attention: The audio feed cuts for two minutes between 1:05:46 through 1:07:46

United States Constitution
Article II: Executive Power Trump v Vance 140 S Ct 2412. (2020)
Fourth Amendment Kansas v. Glover, 140 S.Ct. 1183 (2020) 
Sixth Amendment: Trial by Jury Ramos v Louisiana, 149 S.Ct. 1390 (2020)
Sixth Amendment: Right to Competent Counsel Andrus v Texas. 590 U.S. 1875 (2020) 
Fourteenth Amendment: Due Process Substantive Due Process Kahler v. Kansas, 140 S. Ct. 1021 (2020). 
Fourteenth Amendment: Due Process Retroactivity of a new Constitutional rule McKinney v. Arizona. 140 S.Ct. 702 (2020)

Federal Statutes
8 U.S.C. Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 Kansas v Garcia, 144 S.Ct. 791 (2020)  
18 U.S.C. Ch 44 Firearms, Sec.924 Mandatory minimum if “serious drug offense” Shular v U.S., 140 S.Ct. 779 (2020)
18 U.S.C. Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Sec.1153 Offenses within Indian country McGirt v Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct.2452 (2020)
18 U.S.C. Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Sec.1343 Fraud Kelly v U.S. , 140 S.Ct. 1565 (2020)
28 U.S.C. Ch 153 Habeas Corpus, Sec.2244 Finality of Determination Banister v. Davis 140 S.Ct. 1698 (2020)

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
Rule 51(b) Preserving claim for appeal. Holguin-Hernandez v. U.S., 140 S.Ct. 762 (2020)
Rule 52(b) Plain Error Davis v. United States, 140 S. Ct. 1060 (2020)

Runtime: 2 hours, 15 minutes
Recorded: December 23rd, 2020


Join Professor Saltzman for a in-depth review of the Supreme Court decisions on constitutional cases involving Criminal Law issues during the 2019-2020 term. He will also discuss cases involving Federal Law Statutes and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Professor Saltzman will cover a wide range of cases and break them down and provide insight.

This program was recorded as part of Professor Saltzman series of U.S. Supreme Court seminars on December 23rd, 2020.

Provided By

Saltzman Seminars
Card image cap


Card image cap

Alan Saltzman

Retired Professor of Law

Alan Saltzman is a retired law professor. He received his J.D. from the University of Chicago in 1965, served as Law Clerk to California Supreme Court Justice Matthew Tobriner 1965-66, and was a Fellow in Criminal law and Policy at Stanford University Law School 1971-72. Professor Saltzman taught Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure at the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law from 1976 until retirement in 2008. Before that he taught at the University of Nebraska Law School and the University of Oklahoma Law School. Since retirement he has taught at the University of San Francisco Law School, Seattle University Law School, the Osher Lifelong Learning Institute at San Francisco State and the Fromm Institute for Lifelong Learning at the University of San Francisco.

Card image cap

Similar Courses

Card image cap
122 minutes
A New Regime of Transparency: Anti-Money Laundering and Corporate Transparency Acts of 2020 and Expansion of Cryptocurrency Reporting
Join us for a two-hour program covering the substantial legislative changes made by the Anti-Money Laundering and Corporate Transparency Acts of 2020 and the recent expansion of cryptocurrency reporting announced by FinCEN.

American Bar Association


Add to Cart
Card image cap
92 minutes
Access to Court Records: A Review of Recent Case Law
This program will provide a review of recent cases about accessing court records and provide guidance to communications lawyers looking to obtain these documents for their work. This webinar is free to members of the Forum on Communications Law and students.

American Bar Association


Add to Cart
Card image cap
88 minutes
Applying Copyright Concepts Through the Lens of Goldman v Breitbart News
This program introduces basic technological concepts like “linking,” “embedding,” “how browsers and websites are served” in a robust manner probably beyond the common sense understanding of these concepts, but just enough to explain why the way these technologies really “work” is critical to the arguments that you make as a copyright litigator.

New Media Rights


Add to Cart
Card image cap
91 minutes
Deepfake Audios and Videos: What Lawyers Need to Know
Deepfakes can impact our relationship to information and the tools we use to work with it. How will this new horizon impact the trustworthiness of evidence and will the legal profession have the tools needed to test what they see or hear? What are the implications for the Rule of Law and our elections?

American Bar Association


Add to Cart
Previous Next